Service · Graphic design & illustration
A logo is not yet a brand – a system is
Good design is not the design that looks best in the pitch, but the one that still works two years later: on the website, in a quote, on the delivery van. So we do not build a one-off, we build a set of rules made of colours, typefaces and components – with files you can carry on using yourself.
- Open source files, no vendor lock-in
- Colours checked for contrast
- Image rights cleared in writing
- No AI image without disclosure
At a glance
The short answer first
Four facts about brand and design work – without the design vocabulary.
What you get
A system
The logo in every variant you need, colour and type rules, components for recurring formats – plus a short guide to how it all fits together.
Files
Open and yours
Vector data and font licences pass to you. You are not dependent on us still existing.
Accessibility
From the outset
We check colour combinations for contrast before they enter the system. Changing them later means producing everything again.
Cost
Based on the task
A logo, a brand system and an illustration series involve different scopes. After the briefing, you receive a clearly defined fixed-price deliverable.
What belongs to a brand system
Not every company needs all of it. But anyone who skips the first three points starts from scratch with every new document.
The logo in variants
One logo is never enough: you need a version for small sizes, a single-colour one for stamps and embroidery, one for dark backgrounds. Without them they get improvised later – and look it.
Colours with rules
Not just which colours, but what for: which is primary, which is an accent, what may sit on what. Plus the values for screen and print, so your green looks the same on both.
Typefaces with a licence
A typeface that suits the brand, on a licence that covers web and print. We record what was bought and what it covers – the most common unpleasant surprise when a brand changes hands.
Components, not one-offs
Templates for what comes up regularly: quote, social post, advertisement, presentation. With them, someone without training can also produce something that fits the brand.
Illustration and visual language
Original illustrations or motifs where photographs do not work – for abstract services, for instance. They set you apart from everyone using the same stock library.
A guide people actually read
Not a hundred-page manual but a few pages with what is genuinely needed day to day. A set of rules nobody opens is not a set of rules.
Calculated
Choosing colour is arithmetic, not mood
Whether a colour combination is legible can be calculated – with the same formula that testing tools apply. We do that before a colour enters the brand system, not afterwards.
-
Soft beige on white
1,8:1 insufficient contrast
Looks refined in the pitch and fails in use.
-
Rust on cream
4,9:1 meets AA
Our accent colour – strong enough for body text.
-
Our green on cream
6,6:1 meets AA
The main pairing used on this website.
-
Cream on dark green
10,5:1 meets AAA
For dark bands and print with solid colour.
Calculated with the WCAG 2.2 formula for relative luminance. Thresholds: 4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for large text and for graphics and user interface components.
Decision aid
AI image or original illustration?
Image generators are fast and cheap. For some purposes that is enough – for the images that carry your brand there is a solid reason against them.
| Criterion | Pure AI image | Original illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Minutes | Days to weeks |
| Copyright | Without human creative input no protected work arises – there is nothing that could be assigned to you exclusively | A protected work, with usage rights assigned to you in writing |
| Exclusivity | The same prompt gives others something very similar | Exists exactly once |
| Disclosure | Outputs must be marked in machine-readable form as artificially generated | No disclosure obligation |
| Precision | Hard to steer; details and text within the image stay unreliable | Exactly what is needed – including the fourth motif in a series |
| Where it makes sense | Internal drafts, mood boards, quick idea sketches | Everything that carries your brand outward |
How we work
Four stages, with a clear point in between at which you could stop.
Listening and reviewing
What already exists, what should stay, what gets in the way? We look at how you present yourselves today – and what your customers actually notice of it. Often less is broken than feared.
Settling a direction
Two or three design directions, each shown in real applications rather than on a white background. You decide here, not at the end – that saves expensive reversals.
Working it out
The chosen direction becomes the system: logo variants, colour values for screen and print, font licences, components. Contrast is calculated along the way, not estimated.
Handover
You receive the open source files, the exported formats, the licence records and a short guide. After that you can work with it – including without us.
Honestly: A new visual identity sells nothing on its own. It makes you recognisable and saves you a thousand small daily decisions – but if the offer or the website is unconvincing, the finest logo will not change that. If we see a more urgent problem at your end, we say so before we start designing.
Frequently asked questions about design and illustration
Do we get the source files?
Which usage rights pass with them is set out in writing in the quote; the principles are on our usage rights page.
Can we simply have a logo generated by an AI?
For a logo you intend to use for years and defend against imitation, that is a serious problem. For an internal draft it does not matter. Registering a trade mark is a separate matter and advisable in any case.
Do AI-generated images have to be labelled?
Quite apart from where the obligation sits, we regard visible disclosure as the better practice: state openly where a machine helped and you will not have to justify it later.
Source: European Commission: AI Act, Article 50 (opens in a new tab)
How many drafts do we get to see?
What matters is how they are presented: a logo looks good on white almost every time. It gets interesting on the delivery van, on a letterhead and as a tiny profile picture.
Does our existing logo still work, or does it need replacing?
We will tell you honestly which category yours falls into. A redesign is the bigger commission for us – and we still sometimes advise against it.
How do we know whether colours and type are accessible?
The effort is small, whereas fixing it later is expensive: changing a colour after print, website and signage have been produced means doing all of it again.
Source: W3C: WCAG 2.2 – Contrast (Minimum) (opens in a new tab)
Terms related to this service
Technical terms that appear on this page – explained in one sentence in our glossary.